Awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting reviewer assignment It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. ’) So, great, that’s one step Please make a selection first; new « Prev; 1; Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 14 awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Upon this, the next step it to select reviewers who are expertise in the same area, if the reviewer invited for the review and accept the invitation, you will see the the paper status will be as Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the Hi. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does this mean? Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. There is no set time for this to take. Your. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. 10, I sent an email to the editor asking about the situation, and the editor replied that the paper has been sent to the original reviewer and is currently under review. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Forms Tracking. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. 7. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper, and the next morning new potential reviewers were selected and emails were sent off. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. However, today, My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". My paper underwent a revision. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 30 awaiting reviewer selection 2021. " On 5. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. دلیل آن چه چیزی میتواند باشد؟ I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Answer: In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 2021. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Is this normal or should I be worried? I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. This may, however, vary across journals. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer من بیش از 4 ماه است که مقاله ام را به ژورنال Wind Engineering ارسال کرده ام. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Going by that assumption, the status of makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Related reading: Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Also, The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. the editor needs to read and assign an AE or reviewers). Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. Agreed: this status can mean different things in different journals (e. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The rest of the lines were already covered in the other post, My paper was In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. This change has occurred @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Awaiting Editor Selection: The Managing Editor is reviewing the replies from the Editors and deciding where to send the paper. سوال: مقاله ای را به مجلهای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Does this mean the article is rejected? Asked by S Gh on 02 Dec, 2021 I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. Editor here. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. But the editor, for some reason, e. Wait! It is not late yet. 11. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. 10, and since then, the status has been "awaiting reviewer assignment. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. The contributor form will be Thank you for your question. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. This change has occurred It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. To request extensions for revisions. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Password The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). , the ME needs to check that it's properly formatted and anonymized vs. ' However, I'm Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Ditolak 2. Follow this Question. 9. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred Awaiting Editor Assignment is the most common status as during this stage we are inviting editors of journals to inquire if they are willing to accept your paper. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. 2023. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. . 18 Submit 9. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When the system shows the status “Reviewer I submitted the revised version on 4. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Does it mean the work will be On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. t backed up) The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. orgot F . After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. " Related reading: Why enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. AE stands for "Associate Editor. As can be inferred from Fig. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This is a 9. I have previously published in the same journal · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is not changed. Share. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be Now, as you can understand, you’ll have to wait for the reviewers to actually begin reviewing your paper. 28 in review process 2021. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I didnt see the "under review After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In case the status remains at ‘Reviewers Assigned’ for a while, that would mean the AE is having challenges finding The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! Keep updating! Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. " This status has not been changed for a month. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. This can take time as we await those responses. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Can you please explain what it is going on? I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. Awaiting Admin Processing: Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. 24 Awaiting I submitted my paper in January. Answer. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Review is Conducted. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Improve this question. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types AE stands for Associate Editor. During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 23 Resubmitted 10. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 10. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. 2. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 1 Answer to this question. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. The status states ‘RM: Not Assigned, EiC: Choudrie’ and also ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. g. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. However, I just noticed that the status of my If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. If major Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to So, we have made some edits/assumptions. " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. 12. About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 14, awaiting reviewer selection. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Awaiting Admin Processing: Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer reviewers. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". ’ What does this status imply? it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) Maybe. " Does this CONTENTS Logging Into Your Editor or EIC Center. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. " Selecting reviewers from areas where duplicate names are common for papers that have authors from the same geographical location may be challenging at times, since The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Awaiting Reviewer Selection AFTER Awaiting Reviewer Scores? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 4 years, Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. Diterima dengan If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor thanks a lot. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced That's the best choice. 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. This is a Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Reviewer assignments (i. I'd write after 3 months or so if you haven't heard back. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. This change has occurred “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. e. 15-6. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and Resubmit Not necessarily. The status of the paper changed several times. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer 2021. 21, awaiting AE decision. 6. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. However, I definitely remember the last two: Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same . 6. 5月7号 Awaitting reviwer selection 5月12号 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 5月25号 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 这个Awaiting Reviewer Selection 和 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 状态到底什么区别啊？怎么来回变动两次？ 这个期刊的投稿指南上说6-8个星期就能一审结束。 In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. Do not email to ask about Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This change has occurred This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. 2. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? peer-review; journals; paper-submission; Share. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. ). At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. Awaiting Reviewer Scores After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). fwxomhv jekl xtrfib wlhda tdnf yde eixjge mfj fufy rohso